Asked about Grading: code first, judges second
What are the known biases of an LLM judge?
An answer that works
Preference for longer answers, preference for its own writing style, sensitivity to the order of compared options, and general leniency. Each has a mitigation: rule length out in the rubric, use a different judge model, run both orders, and include concrete examples of failures in the rubric.
Reading an answer is not being able to give one. The section that teaches this is Grading: code first, judges second, 6 hours of Evaluation.
Learn this properlyAlso asked about Evaluation
What is an eval?Why can you not just use unit tests?How would you start evaluating an existing feature with no evals?You join a team with an LLM feature and no evals. What do you do in the first week?Why note only the first failure in a trace?Why binary judges rather than a one to five scale?Where do eval cases come from?Why split an eval set into train and test?
All 24 questions on Evaluation