Asked about Evaluating agents and multi-step systems
Why is final-answer accuracy not enough for an agent?
An answer that works
It does not tell you where failures start, it ignores side effects on other data, and it ignores cost and step count. Two runs can reach the same answer, one cleanly and one after ten wasted tool calls.
Reading an answer is not being able to give one. The section that teaches this is Evaluating agents and multi-step systems, 5 hours of Evaluation.
Learn this properlyAlso asked about Evaluation
What is an eval?Why can you not just use unit tests?How would you start evaluating an existing feature with no evals?You join a team with an LLM feature and no evals. What do you do in the first week?Why note only the first failure in a trace?Why binary judges rather than a one to five scale?Where do eval cases come from?Why split an eval set into train and test?
All 24 questions on Evaluation