Asked about The rounds that are not about code
What do you think the most serious risk from this technology is, and what would change your mind?
An answer that works
Give a specific position with the reasons you hold it, then answer the second half honestly, because it is the half most candidates have nothing for. Name the evidence that would move you. What is assessed is that the position is yours and survives being pushed on, not which position it is.
Then they push further
Where do you disagree with us?
Give an actual disagreement, specifically, about something you have read. Agreeing with everything reads as not having engaged or as managing the room. Concede a point if the interviewer supplies one you had not considered; that is not losing the exchange.
Then why work here at all, if you think that?
The honest reconciliation, whatever it is. This is the consistency check: the answer has to fit what you said in the screen about why you applied, and what you will say in a design round about shipping carefully.
What gets marked up
Strong answers are specific, consistent with the rest of the loop, and hold under two or three exchanges of pushback while conceding individual points. Performed alarm and blanket dismissal both fail.
Reading an answer is not being able to give one. The section that teaches this is The rounds that are not about code, 4 hours of Interviewing well.
Learn this properlyAlso asked about Interviewing well